Religious guidelines label the pig an “unclean” animal, and prohibit the consumption of pork.
1. Pork prohibited in Qur’an
The Qur’an prohibits the consumption of pork in no less than 4 different places.
It is prohibited in 2:173, 5:3, 6:145 and 16:115.
“Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine,
and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than Allah.”
[Al-Qur’an 5:3]
The above verses of the Holy Qur’an are sufficient to satisfy a Muslim as to why pork is forbidden.
2. Pork prohibited in the Bible
The Christian is likely to be convinced by his religious scriptures.
The Bible prohibits the consumption of pork, in the book of Leviticus:
“And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be cloven footed, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you”.
“Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcass shall ye not touch, they are unclean to you.” [Leviticus 11:7-8]
Regardless of your spiritual beliefs, there may be good reason to
carefully consider your decision to include pork as part of your diet,
as despite advertising campaigns trying to paint pork as a “healthy”
alternative to beef, research suggests it may be hazardous to your
health on multiple levels.
Pork consumption has a strong
epidemiological association with cirrhosis of the liver — in fact, it
may be more strongly associated with cirrhosis than alcohol (although
some have questioned the studies that indicate this, and point out that
countries with high pork consumption tend to have low obesity rates.)
Other studies also show an association between pork consumption and liver cancer as well as multiple sclerosis.
What’s behind this data?
Most U.S. Pigs are Fed Grains, Making Them High in Inflammatory Omega-6 Fats
One contributing factor is the diet upon which the pigs are raised,
which will impact the level of polyunsaturated omega-6 fat it contains.
Too many polyunsaturated fats (PUFAs) contribute to chronic
inflammation, which causes all sorts of problems over the long-term.
Inflammation is at the source of just about every chronic disease we see
today.
Most pigs raised in the United States are fed
grains and possibly seed oils, which dramatically increase their omega-6
content, as well as the highly inflammatory byproduct of omega-6 fatty
acid metabolism: arachadonic acid. According to the Weston A. Price
Foundation, lard from pigs fed this type of diet may be 32 percent
PUFAs. On the other hand, lard from pigs raised on pasture and acorns
had a much lower PUFA content, at 8.7 percent, while those fed a Pacific
Island diet rich in coconut had even less, only 3.1 percent.i
About one third of the staff at Mercola.com
is based in the Philippines where pork is a very popular part of their
diet. However, unlike the U.S. in which most of the pigs are fed grains,
most of the pig diet in the Philippines is vegetable based. My staff
tells me that there is a dramatic difference in the taste. So it is
possible that many of the adverse consequences being ascribed to pork
may be related to the pigs’ diet.
As reported by Dr. Paul
Jaminet, a trained astrophysicist and his wife Shou-Ching, a Harvard
biomedical scientist, who together authored the book Perfect Health
Diet:
“So the omega-6 content can cover a 10-fold
range, 3% to 32%, with the highest omega-6 content in corn- and
wheat-fed pigs who have been caged for fattening. Corn oil and wheat
germ oil are 90% PUFA, and caging prevents exercise and thus inhibits
the disposal of excess PUFA. Caging is a common practice in industrial
food production.”
Consumption of this PUFA-rich meat may
very well be a factor in liver disease, as studies show feeding mice
corn oil (rich in omega-6) and alcohol (which is metabolically similar
to fructose) induces liver disease,ii and omega-6 fats have also been
linked to cirrhosis of the liver.
However, even though most
pork in the United States is likely to be high in omega-6 fats, it is
not the largest contributor of omega-6 fats in the U.S. diet — this
honor goes to vegetable oils. Dr. Jaminet continues:
“Either fructose or alcohol can react with polyunsaturated fat to
produce liver disease. Sugar consumption, for example in soft drinks,
may be just as likely to combine with pork to cause a cirrhotic liver as
alcohol. But no other common dietary component can substitute for the
role of polyunsaturated fat in causing liver disease.
…
We would expect that if pork can cause liver cirrhosis it will also
promote liver cancer, since injured and inflamed tissues are more likely
to become cancerous. Indeed, there is an association between pork
consumption and the primary liver cancer. … But fat composition is
hardly likely to be the sole issue with pork. Most polyunsaturated fats
in modern diets are derived from vegetable oils, not pork. It seems that
there must be something else in pork besides polyunsaturated fat that
is causing liver disease.”
Most Pork is Consumed in Processed Form
Another reason to reconsider pork, in theory, would be the fact
that most is consumed in processed form. Dr. Jaminet reports that in the
U.S., pork consumption can be broken down as follows:
Smoked ham 28%
Sausage 13%
Bacon 6%
Processed lunchmeat 6%
Other forms of processed pork 10%
Processed meats are those preserved by smoking, curing or salting,
or the addition of chemical preservatives. Particularly problematic are
the nitrates that are added to these meats as a preservative, coloring
and flavoring. The nitrates found in processed meats are frequently
converted into nitrosamines, which are clearly associated with an
increased risk of certain cancers. It’s for this reason that the USDA
actually requires adding ascorbic acid (vitamin C) or erythorbic acid to
bacon cure, as it helps reduce the formation of nitrosamines.
Meat cooked at high temperatures, as many processed meats often are,
can also contain as many as 20 different kinds of heterocyclic amines,
or HCAs for short. These substances are also linked to cancer. Heating
meat at high temperatures also appears to increase the formation of
nitrosamines, with well-done or burned bacon having significantly more
nitrosamines than less well-done bacon.
Many processed
meats are also smoked as part of the curing process, and smoking is a
well-known cause of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which
enter your food during the smoking process.
So it’s known
that eating processed meats exposes you to at least three cancer-causing
substances: nitrates and nitrites (leading to nitrosamines),
heterocyclic amines, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Ironically,
despite this known connection, Dr. Jaminet reports that liver cancer
appears to be even more strongly associated with the consumption of
fresh pork than processed pork, which suggests another causative factor.
Does Pork Contain an Infectious, Disease-Causing Pathogen?
This is the conclusion reached by Dr. Jaminet, who suggests that an
infectious pathogen in pork is responsible for the associated health
conditions including liver disease and multiple sclerosis:
“Consider: Traditional methods of processing pork, such as salting,
smoking, and curing, are antimicrobial. They were developed to help
preserve pork from pathogens. So if processed pork is less risky than
fresh pork, we should look for a pathogen that is reduced in number by
processing.
If a pathogen is the cause, then it makes
sense that fiber would be protective [fiber consumption is protective
against pork-induced cancer]. Fiber increases gut bacterial populations.
Gut bacteria get “first crack” at food and release proteases and other
compounds that can kill pathogens. Also, a large gut bacterial
population makes for a vigilant immune system at the gut barrier, making
it more likely that pathogens will fail to enter the body. The gut
flora are a valuable part of the gut’s immune defenses.”
So
while pork is arguably “good” meat from a biochemical perspective, I
believe there is enough scientific evidence to justify the reservations
or outright prohibitions in many cultures against consuming it. Pigs are
scavenger animals and will eat just about anything, alive, sick or
dead. Their appetite for less-than-wholesome foods makes pigs a breeding
ground for potentially dangerous infections. Even cooking pork for long
periods is not enough to kill many of the retroviruses and other
parasites that many of them harbor.
This is why my nutrition plan recommends consciously avoiding pork whenever possible.
Granted, the occasional consumption of pork might be fine, but it’s
a risk, and the more you consume it the more likely it is that you will
eventually acquire some type of infection. The pork and swine industry
has been continually plagued, and continues to be so to this day, by a
wide variety of hazardous and deadly infections and diseases, including:
PRRS — A horrendous disease, which I first reported on in
2001, but which had been a nightmare for many nations since the
mid-1980s, is still alive and kicking today. At one point referred to as
“swine mystery disease,” “blue abortion,” and “swine infertility,” the
disease was finally named “Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory
Syndrome” (PRRS), and may afflict about 75 percent of American pig
herds.
The PRRS virus primarily attacks the pig’s
immune system, leaving its body open to a host of infections,
particularly in the lungs. Initial research revealed that the virus was
transmitted via semen, saliva and blood, leaving pigs herded closely
together and transported in close quarters by trucks more susceptible to
infection.
However, according to research presented at
the 2007 International PRRS Symposium, the disease is also airborne,
making eradication efforts very difficult.
The Nipah Virus –
Discovered in 1999, the Nipah virus has caused disease in both animals
and humans, through contact with infected animals. In humans, the virus
can lead to deadly encephalitis (an acute inflammation of your brain). I
originally reported on this virus in 2000, but according to CDC data,
the Nipah virus reemerged again in 2004.iii
Porcine
Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV) – According to a study in the journal
Lancet, this virus can spread to people receiving pig organ transplants,
and according to test tube studies, PERV strains do have the ability to
infect human cells.iv
PERV genes are scattered
throughout pigs’ genetic material, and researchers have found that pig
heart, spleen and kidney cells release various strains of the virus.
Menangle Virus – In 1998, it was reported that a new virus infecting
pigs was able to jump to humans. The menangle virus was discovered in
August 1997 when sows at an Australian piggery began giving birth to
deformed and mummified piglets.
Based on this research we can understand why our Creator has Forbidden for us the consumption of pork.
- The Miracle of Airplane – Can a Tornado Build a Boeing 747? - November 11, 2024
- Finding Answers in the Quran to the Most Common Questions - November 11, 2024
- Remembering Our Parents After They Pass - November 11, 2024